Collateral Consequences and Criminal Justice: Future Policy and Constitutional Directions
National policy with respect to collateral consequences is receiving more attention than it has in decades. This article outlines and explains some of the reasons for the new focus. The legal system is beginning to recognize that for many people convicted of crime, the greatest effect is not imprisonment, but being marked as a criminal and subjected to legal disabilities. Consequences can include loss of civil rights, loss of public benefits, and ineligibility for employment, licenses, and permits. The United States, the 50 states, and their agencies and subdivisions impose collateral consequences—often applicable for life—based on convictions from any jurisdiction. However, because they were deemed “civil,” collateral consequences have been created and imposed with few constitutional limitations.
In recent years, the American Law Institute, American Bar Association, and Uniform Law Commission all have proposed reforms, which are now being seriously considered in a number of jurisdictions. Meanwhile, scholars have advanced, and courts have sometimes accepted, an argument that they previously rejected, namely that collateral consequences can be of constitutional magnitude. As courts take collateral consequences more seriously, legislatures have begun to reduce the numbers of collateral consequences and provide legal mechanisms for the relief of those that remain.
Collateral Consequences and Criminal Justice: Future Policy and Constitutional Directions,
102 Marq. L. Rev. 233
Available at: https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol102/iss1/9
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Fourteenth Amendment Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legislation Commons