Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2025
Publication Information
Michael O'Hear, The Excessive Fines Clause in the Federal Courts: A Quarter-Century of Narrowing, 12 Tex. A&M L. Rev. 761 (2025)
Source Publication
12 Texas A&M Law Review 761 (2025)
Abstract
The Eighth Amendment prohibits “excessive fines,” but what exactly does “excessive” mean? The question has taken on some urgency in recent years as American legislatures have sharply increased the economic penalties associated with criminal convictions. In 1998, in United States v. Bajakajian, the Supreme Court for the first time established a test of sorts to determine whether an economic penalty is “excessive” in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The test was not without its ambiguities but offered some potentially robust protection against the rising tide of fines, fees, forfeiture, and restitution. However, the promise of Bajakajian has been undermined in the lower courts.
This Article presents the first systematic analysis of how Bajakajian has been interpreted and applied by the federal circuit courts of appeals. The Article shows that, at practically every turn, the circuit courts have adopted narrowing interpretations of Bajakajian, which have largely negated the practical significance of the Eighth Amendment ban on excessive fines. Indeed, in some important respects, the circuit-court opinions more closely resemble the dissenting than the majority opinion in Bajakajian. The Article concludes with a consideration of what the Supreme Court might do in response to the circuit-court cases, from acquiescence to simple reaffirmation of Bajakajian to the development of an even more robust and easily enforceable approach to the Eighth Amendment right.
Repository Citation
O'Hear, Michael M., "The Excessive Fines Clause in the Federal Courts: A Quarter-Century of Narrowing" (2025). Faculty Publications. 722.
https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/facpub/722
