A Critical Assessment of the Model Standards of Conduct for Mediators (2005): Call for Reform

Authors

Omer Shapira, Ono Academic College

Abstract

Over the years, commentators have raised concerns about some aspects of the Model Standards, for example, their failure to adequately guide mediators in situations of competing values, and the vagueness of their substantive provisions. No work to date has exposed the Model Standards to a systematic and comprehensive assessment, which is necessary for an evaluation of their adequacy as a coherent statement of the fundamental ethical guidelines for mediators, and for the development of a viable alternative to them. Ten years after the adoption of the revised Model Standards in 2005, this Article comes to fill the gap in the literature and open the discussion on the next version of the Model Standards

Repository Citation

Omer Shapira, A Critical Assessment of the Model Standards of Conduct for Mediators (2005): Call for Reform, 100 Marq. L. Rev. 81 (2016).
Available at: https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol100/iss1/3